On Doing Research

Research in the field of healthcare or body structure is done to find the reason something undesirable is happening with bodies so one can fix it and have the bodies working correctly (healthy). It is an investigation to find a WHY.

A correct WHY is not just a reason something happens. A truly correct WHY gives the basic reason something is not working as it is supposed to work and leads you to being able to correct it. So, if someone tells you why something is happening and it does not lead to being able to fix it......what do you do? Read on.

To truly understand what a "why" is it is helpful to define a few other words.

You may think I am starting a bit too basic but  these basic investigation principles are not recognized by most of the researchers in the healthcare field of structural healing. That is why, until now, body mechanics have not been figured out to the point doctors could consistently and predictably fix people’s bodies. Here are the words:

IDEAL SCENE = something that is exactly as desired.

OUT = When something is "out" that something is not as it should be. Example: Something must be out with that person’s body because they have back pain.

OUTPOINT = something that is not as it should be to accomplish a desired end. Example: He understands how it works but just can’t seem to get the job done. This is an outpoint because someone who truly understands something can do it.

OUTNESS = a condition of something being wrong, incorrect or missing. This is a noun. Example: The outpoint above results in the outness of "can’t seem to get the job done".

Now we can define a WHY in healthcare research.

A WHY in healthcare research = a basic outness found in the body which, when corrected, leads to restoration of health.

Health of a body is an ideal scene it is not just some idealistic thing that cannot be reached. A healthy body can be exactly defined: HEALTH BODY = a body operating optimally = a body operating the best it is possible for a body to operate. (This is not the best it can operate under the some type of circumstances, whatever those circumstances may be, but operating the best possible period.)

A WRONG WHY and BEING REASONABLE

Before I go on I would like to define a WRONG WHY and REASONABLE.

WRONG WHY = a proposed outness that, corrected, does not lead to the restoration of health to a body not functioning optimally.

REASONABLE = Accepting an answer for why something is out though correcting that point does not lead to correction of the outness. Basically it is accepting a WRONG WHY and not going further to find the right Why.

As you can see, BEING REASONABLE means you either have some excuse for not accomplishing the goal you set out to accomplish or you have accepted some excuse from someone else about not being able to accomplish the goal you or they set out to do. You can see from this that any reason, or any WHY, that does not lead to being able to accomplish your goal is a WRONG WHY. You might run into many wrong whys when trying to get something corrected, but anyone accepting a WHY that does not immediately lead to a way to accomplish their goal is committing the most horrible of sins, BEING REASONABLE. Why is BEING REASONABLE the most horrible of sins? Because it leaves you never able to accomplish your goal.

Given these definitions one can see that a research project on structural health would lead to two very basic things.

1. Being able to identify outnesses to correct in bodies not functioning optimally. (Why the body is unhealthy.)

2. Being able to correct those outnesses so the body will return to health (functioning optimally).

continued on page 2...

top